Table 2.
Cup inclination |
Cup anteversion |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional | Robotic | Conventional | Robotic | |
Tsai et al. [24] | 42.2 (±6.7) | 35.4 (±4.4) | 24.5 (±17.4) | 22.8 (±5.1) |
Domb et al. [83] | 42.6 (±5.4) | 40 (±3.2) | 13.3 (±7) | 16.7 (±3) |
Kamara et al. [51] | 41.5 (±37.5) | 40.5 (±14) | 23.6 (±56.3) | 19.4 (±19.5) |
Kong et al. [52] | 40.35 (±6.57) | 41.52 (±4.05) | 16.91 (±5.48) | 19.12 (±4.45) |
Domb et al. [38] | 41.72 (±5.27) | 40.13 (±3.33) | 21.83 (±6.09) | 16.91 (±3.87) |
El Bitar et al. [56] | 40.33 (±3.33) | 38.9 (±3.2) | 16.9 (±3.0) | 20.3 (±2.8) |
Elson et al. [47] | 40.0 (±1.2) | 39.9 (±2.0) | 18.7 (±3.1) | 18.6 (±3.9) |
Kanawade et al. [54] | 39.4 (±3.4) | 38.8 (±1.6) | 19.1 (±4.2) | 20.7 (±2.4) |
Nodzo et al. [48] | 40.12 (±3.0) | 40.4 (±2.1) | 23.0 (±2.4) | 23.2 (±2.3) |
Redmond et al. [55] | 40.5 (±4.3) | 39.3 (±2.5) | 21.3 (±4.0) | 20.6 (±2.4) |