Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 27;6:45. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020041

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics, follow-up and complications of reported main studies on robotic-assisted THA studies.

Cup inclination
Cup anteversion
Conventional Robotic Conventional Robotic
Tsai et al. [24] 42.2 (±6.7) 35.4 (±4.4) 24.5 (±17.4) 22.8 (±5.1)
Domb et al. [83] 42.6 (±5.4) 40 (±3.2) 13.3 (±7) 16.7 (±3)
Kamara et al. [51] 41.5 (±37.5) 40.5 (±14) 23.6 (±56.3) 19.4 (±19.5)
Kong et al. [52] 40.35 (±6.57) 41.52 (±4.05) 16.91 (±5.48) 19.12 (±4.45)
Domb et al. [38] 41.72 (±5.27) 40.13 (±3.33) 21.83 (±6.09) 16.91 (±3.87)
El Bitar et al. [56] 40.33 (±3.33) 38.9 (±3.2) 16.9 (±3.0) 20.3 (±2.8)
Elson et al. [47] 40.0 (±1.2) 39.9 (±2.0) 18.7 (±3.1) 18.6 (±3.9)
Kanawade et al. [54] 39.4 (±3.4) 38.8 (±1.6) 19.1 (±4.2) 20.7 (±2.4)
Nodzo et al. [48] 40.12 (±3.0) 40.4 (±2.1) 23.0 (±2.4) 23.2 (±2.3)
Redmond et al. [55] 40.5 (±4.3) 39.3 (±2.5) 21.3 (±4.0) 20.6 (±2.4)