Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;6(2):100636. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.100636

Table 2.

Quantitative measurement of exposure dose in mW/cm2 at 5 locations on convex (A) and concave (B) surface of the FFR, as demonstrated in Figure 3

Mask height Rack column Position on mask Irradiance (mW/cm2) Irradiance normalized to position 3A Time (sec) to deliver 1000 (mJ/cm2)
68.5 (cm) 1 1A 1.868 1.24 535
2A 0.637 0.42 1570
3A 1.501 1.00 666
4A 0.745 0.50 1343
5A 0.746 0.50 1340
1B 1.212 0.81 825
2B 1.129 0.75 886
3B 1.205 0.80 830
4B 1.396 0.93 716
5B 1.574 1.05 635
162.0 (cm) 3 1A 1.150 0.72 870
2A 0.966 0.61 1036
3A 1.596 1.00 627
4A 0.775 0.49 1290
5A 1.684 1.06 594
1B 1.505 0.94 664
2B 1.126 0.71 888
3B 1.342 0.84 745
4B 1.241 0.78 806
5B 0.675 0.42 1481

Abbreviation: FFR = filtering facepiece respirator.

Measurements obtained via ultraviolet germicidal irradiation meter. The most divergent locations were selected as examples of dose distribution across the FFR. Substantial variation in dose is demonstrated and dependent on distance from bulb, proximity to aluminum flashing, and arced surface of FFR. The irradiance at each position is normalized to position 3A (bold). Additional measurements from other rack locations are demonstrated in Table E1.