Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 29;8(11):e11401. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11401

TABLE 5.

Models of total cover in monoculture plots.

VI used VI Volume R 2 AIC ∆AIC
GDVI2 0.72, P < 0.0001 0.16, P = 5e‐04 0.661 483.05 0
GDVI2 0.80, P < 0.0001 0.644 493.35 10.3
NDVI 0.73, P < 0.0001 0.10, P = 0.0497 0.622 510.61 27.56
NDVI 0.79, P < 0.0001 0.616 512.52 29.47
GNDVI 0.78, P < 0.0001 0.607 518.76 35.71
GNDVI 0.76, P < 0.0001 0.04, P = 0.4758 0.607 520.24 37.19
NIR 0.69, P < 0.0001 0.481 589.04 105.99
NIR 0.67, P < 0.0001 0.03, P = 0.6723 0.481 590.86 107.81
REG 0.58, P < 0.0001 0.13, P = 0.0481 0.463 599.7 116.65
REG 0.67, P < 0.0001 0.455 601.67 118.62
RED −0.43, P < 0.0001 0.40, P < 0.0001 0.45 605.63 122.58
RED −0.56, P < 0.0001 0.31 661.45 178.4
0.55, P < 0.0001 0.287 669.88 186.83
GRE −0.04, P = 0.4078 0.55, P < 0.0001 0.289 671.18 188.13
GRE 0.02, P = 0.7886 0 755.59 272.54

— = no covariate was used; AIC = Akaike’s information criterion; ∆AIC = the difference between the AIC of the best model evaluated for that test and the model being reported; GDVI2 = generalized difference vegetation index; GNDVI = green normalized difference vegetation index; GRE = green; NDVI = normalized difference vegetation index; NIR = near infrared; REG = red edge; VI = vegetation index.