Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 18;189(12):1573–1582. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa071

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models of the Association of the Prevalence of Smoking Versus Not Inline graphic and the Smoking Intensity (Inline graphic or Inline graphic) With the Prevalence of Confirmed Clinical Neuropathy at 13 Years of Follow-up in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Cohort, North America, Circa 2006

Model Coefficient  
(Factor)
Estimate a SE P Value Model χ 2 df P Value
Noncenteredb 1: Inline graphic Inline graphic −0.5891 0.3064 0.0545 0.24 1 0.6217
Inline graphic 0.0084 0.0170 0.6217
Noncenteredb 2: Inline graphic Inline graphic −0.9010 0.0687 <0.0001 6.09 1 0.0136
Inline graphic 0.0232 0.0094 0.0136
Noncenteredb 3: Inline graphic Inline graphic −0.9170 0.0706 <0.0001 7.19 2 0.0274
Inline graphic 0.0084 0.0170 0.6215
Inline graphic 0.3280 0.3144 0.2969
Centeredc 4: Inline graphic Inline graphic −0.4610 0.1585 0.0036 0.24 1 0.6217
Inline graphic 0.0084 0.0170 0.6217
Centeredc 5: Inline graphic Inline graphic −0.8459 0.0643 <0.0001 0.27 1 0.6001
Inline graphic 0.0094 0.0180 0.6001
Centeredc 6: Inline graphic Inline graphic −0.9170 0.0706 <0.0001 7.19 2 0.0274
Inline graphic 0.0084 0.0170 0.6215
Inline graphic 0.4561 0.1735 0.0086

Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom; SE, standard error.

a Estimate is the log odds ratio.

b Models with noncentered smoking intensities (x, models 1–3).

c Models with centered intensities (c, after subtracting the mean, models 4–6).