Table 3.
(a) Differences in Domains and Overall Scores According to Provider Type, Adjusted for Patients’ Characteristics.†
| Dignity |
Communication |
Coordination of care |
Confidentiality |
Choice |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. CI | Coef. (CI) | Coef. (CI) | Coef. (CI) | Coef. (CI) | Coef. (CI) |
| Constant | 3.75* [3.56; 3.94] | 3.64* [3.48; 3.80] | 2.29* [2.04; 2.54] | 3.33* [3.02; 3.64] | 2.34* [1.85; 2.84] |
| Provider ref. urban PHC | |||||
| Private clinics | 0.09 [−0.15; 0.34] | −0.02 [−0.20; 0.16] | −0.62* [−0.94; −0.30] | 0.45* [0.03; 0.86] | 0.09 [−0.47; 0.66] |
| Rural PHC | −0.09 [−0.27; 0.09] | 0.07 [−0.06; 0.22] | 0.52* [0.29; 0.76] | 0.18 [−0.11; 0.47] | 0.55* [0.13; 0.97] |
| Gender ref. female | |||||
| Male | −0.006 [−0.06; 0.05] | −0.03 [−0.09; 0.02] | 0.07 [−0.01; 0.15] | 0.02 [−0.04; 0.07] | 0.02 [−0.06; 0.13] |
| Age ref. <60 years | |||||
| >60 years | 0.03 [−0.06; 0.13] | 0.04 [−0.05; 0.14] | −0.02 [−0.15; 0.09] | 0.007 [−0.09; 0.10] | 0.04 [−0.11; 0.21] |
| Education ref. university | |||||
| High school (12 years) | −0.01 [−0.11; 0.07] | 0 .08 [0.01; 0.18] | 0.03 [−0.09; 0.15] | −0.02 [−0.11; 0.07] | −0.01 [−0.16; 0.14] |
| Primary (9 years) | −0.05 [−0.14; 0.04] | 0.08 [−0.01; 0.18] | 0.05 [−0.07; 0.17] | −0.05 [−0.15; 0.04] | 0.03 [−0.11; 0.19] |
| Other | −0.08 [−0.24; 0.08] | 0.19* [0.03, 0.35] | 0.25 [0.03; 0.46] | 0.18 [0.01; 0.35] | 0.33 [0.05; 0.6] |
| Chronic conditions ref. no Ch. condition (0) | |||||
| 1 | 0.01 [−0.05; 0.08] | −0.03 [−0.09; 0.04] | 0.16* [0.06; 0.25] | −0.07 [−0.08; −0.06] | 0.04 [−0.08; 0.15] |
| ≥2 | −0.02 [−0.10; 0.07] | 0.01 [−0.07; 0.1] | 0.2* [0.07; 0.32] | 0.05 [−0.04; 0.14 | 0.04 [−0.1; 0.19] |
| Insurance ref. not insured | |||||
| Insured | −0.03 [−0.11; 0.03] | −0.01 [−0.09; 0.06] | 0.21* [0.09; 0.31] | −0.01 [−0.09; 0.07] | 0.08 [−0.05; 0.22] |
| Utilization of HC ref. (<=1) | |||||
| ≥2 | −0.001 [−0.07; 0.07] | 0.02 [−0.05; 0.09] | 0.12* [0.02; 0.21] | −0.012 [−0.08; 0.06] | 0.07 [−0.05; 0.2] |
| Benefiting SE.AID ref. no*** | 0 | ||||
| Yes | −0.08* [−0.16; 0.01] | −0.07** [−0.15; 0.01] | 0.03 [−0.07; 0.13] | −0.05 [−0.13; 0.03] | 0.11 [−0.02; 0.25] |
| Occupation ref. employed | |||||
| Unemployed | 0.06 [−0.01; 0.14] | 0.07** [−0.004; 0.14] | 0.09 [−0.008; 0.19] | 0.03 [−0.04; 0.11] | −0.11 [−0.24; 0.02] |
| Pensioner | −0.05 [−0.16; 0.05] | −0.04 [−0.01; 0.06] | 0.14* [−0.02; 0.28] | −0.06 [−0.17; 0.05] | −0.14 [−0.33; 0.04] |
| Health service ref. satisfied | |||||
| Unsatisfied | 0.09 [−0.11; 0.28] | −0.16 [−0.35; 0.03] | 0.18 [−0.06; 0.43] | 0.1 [−0.10; 0.31] | 0.29 [−0.07; 0.64] |
†
The analyses were conducted using linear mixed models with random intercepts for districts and facilities nested in districts. All variables were simultaneously included in the respective models. P-values were obtained from the Wald tests of the respective parameter estimates *P < .05. **P < .1. ***Benefit from social-economic support.