Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;11(12):3521–3527. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13695

Table 2.

Difference of the response to nivolumab according to the clinical parameters and CT morphological characteristics

Parameters Response to nivolumab, N P‐value
Age ≥75 (n = 11) 2 0.85
<75 (n = 58) 12
Gender Male (n = 52) 14 < 0.05
Female (n = 17) 0
Smoking Heavy smoker (n = 49) 14 < 0.05
Light or never smoker (n = 20) 0
ECOG performance status 0,1 (n = 64) 13 0.987
2 (n = 5) 1
EGFR mutation Positive (n = 8) 1 0.547
Negative (n = 60) 13
Histology Squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16) 4 0.286
Others (n = 53) 10
Interstitial septal thickening Positive (n = 16) 1 0.093
Negative (n = 50) 13
Peritumoral ground‐glass opacity Positive (n = 37) 5 0.099
Negative (n = 30) 9
Spiculated margin Positive (n = 13) 1 0.21
Negative (n = 56) 13
Air bronchogram Positive (n = 6) 1 0.817
Negative (n = 63) 13
Cavity or necrosis Positive (n = 14) 3 0.906
Negative (n = 55) 11
Adjacent organ invasion Positive (n = 8) 1 0.56
Negative (n = 61) 13
Bulky lymph node (≥2.5 cm) Positive (n = 10) 2 0.98
Negative (n = 59) 12
Accumulation of small lymph nodes Positive (n = 3) 1 0.566
Negative (n = 66) 13

Objective response rate could be evaluated in 69 of 78 subjects.

Heavy smoker, Brinkman index ≥400; Light or never smoker, Brinkman index <400.