Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;63(22):13719–13732. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01277

Table 2. Differences in Viability of GLC-4 and ABCC1-Overexpressing GLC-4/adr Cells Treated with COTI-2, COTI-NH2, Fe-COTI-2, Cu-COTI-2, and Triapine for 72 h.

compound GLC-4 (IC50, μM)a GLC-4/adr (IC50, μM)a relative resistanceb ABCC1 substratec
COTI-2 0.03 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.15 17.3* YES
Triapine 0.65 ± 0.09 0.57 ± 0.05 0.9n.s. NO
COTI-NH2 3.64 ± 0.39 3.65 ± 0.41 1.0n.s. NO
Fe-COTI-2 0.79 ± 0.07 0.80 ± 0.11 1.0n.s. NO
Cu-COTI-2 0.02 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.02 3.2* YES
a

IC50 values were calculated from concentration–response curves measured by the MTT assay. Values are given as mean ± SD of two or three independent experiments, in triplicates.

b

Relative resistance was calculated by dividing the IC50 values of the resistant GLC-4/adr by those of the parental GLC-4 cells. *p ≤ 0.05; n.s., not significantly different; calculated by one-sample t-test.

c

Proposed substrate assignment based on data of GLC-4 and SW480 models.