Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;2020:8954085. doi: 10.34133/2020/8954085

Table 4.

SVM classification performance. Support vector machine (SVM) classification performance for the experiment containing three treatments (control, mock-inoculated, and inoculated seedlings).

Comparison Model Data set Accuracy 10-fold CV accuracy Proportion correctly classified
Control Mock-inoculated Inoculated
All groups Second derivative Training 0.822 0.708 0.825 0.786 0.854
Testing 0.733 0.788 0.600 0.811
VSURF Training 0.830 0.664 0.775 0.810 0.899
Testing 0.714 0.576 0.600 0.946
Resampled Training 0.866 0.644 0.813 0.905 0.876
Testing 0.657 0.606 0.600 0.757
Mock vs. inoculated Second derivative Training 1.000 0.757 1.000 1.000
Testing 0.806 0.829 0.784
VSURF Training 0.890 0.832 0.810 0.966
Testing 0.861 0.829 0.892
Resampled Training 0.936 0.809 0.881 0.989
Testing 0.847 0.800 0.892
Control vs. inoculated Second derivative Training 0.911 0.811 0.850 0.966
Testing 0.886 0.848 0.919
VSURF Training 0.763 0.746 0.688 0.831
Testing 0.643 0.485 0.784
Resampled Training 0.710 0.704 0.650 0.764
Testing 0.643 0.545 0.730