Table 2.
Assay | Template | Mean Ct values at quantified copy number of RNA transcript |
r2a | Slopeb | Efficiency (%)c | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 × 106 | 1 × 105 | 1 × 104 | 1 × 103 | 1 × 102 | 1 × 101 | ||||||
N gene assay | IPBCAMS assays | RNA transcriptd alone | 17.63 ± 0.09e | 21.99 ± 0.29 | 24.08 ± 0.09 | 28.25 ± 0.13 | 31.00 ± 0.06 | 33.73 ± 0.25 | −3.19 | 105.82 | |
RNA transcript + other viruses | 19.40 ± 0.19 | 22.40 ± 0.04 | 26.38 ± 0.09 | 29.98 ± 0.07 | 32.17 ± 0.28 | 34.51 ± 0.26 | −3.10 | 110.17 | |||
WHO assays | RNA transcript alone | 18.44 ± 0.19 | 22.65 ± 0.27 | 26.78 ± 0.32 | 29.60 ± 0.26 | 32.68 ± 0.15 | 33.97 ± 1.73 | −3.16 | 107.23 | ||
RNA transcript + other viruses | 19.51 ± 0.15 | 24.83 ± 0.36 | 26.59 ± 0.29 | 29.62 ± 0.54 | 32.62 ± 0.70 | 34.19 ± 0.51 | −2.85 | 124.32 | |||
CCDC assays | RNA transcript alone | 17.17 ± 0.09 | 20.71 ± 0.11 | 23.94 ± 0.07 | 27.57 ± 0.20 | 30.37 ± 0.12 | 33.53 ± 0.50 | −3.27 | 102.21 | ||
RNA transcript + other viruses | 18.93 ± 0.16 | 23.79 ± 0.20 | 25.66 ± 0.23 | 29.58 ± 0.52 | 31.92 ± 0.16 | 33.81 ± 0.87 | −2.93 | 119.43 | |||
ORF 1b gene assay | IPBCAMS assays | RNA transcript alone | 18.64 ± 0.14 | 22.20 ± 0.06 | 25.73 ± 0.28 | 28.83 ± 0.37 | 31.90 ± 1.42 | 34.22 ± 1.15 | −3.15 | 107.71 | |
RNA transcript + other viruses | 19.45 ± 0.06 | 22.98 ± 0.13 | 25.88 ± 0.17 | 29.37 ± 0.12 | 32.83 ± 0.40 | 34.65 ± 2.12 | −3.12 | 109.18 | |||
WHO assays | RNA transcript alone | 18.51 ± 0.11 | 21.60 ± 0.10 | 25.05 ± 0.22 | 28.27 ± 0.12 | 30.78 ± 0.09 | 32.57 ± 0.57 | −2.89 | 121.83 | ||
RNA transcript + other viruses | 19.46 ± 0.09 | 22.58 ± 0.13 | 25.75 ± 0.19 | 28.20 ± 0.20 | 30.03 ± 0.70 | 33.04 ± 0.14 | −2.65 | 138.43 | |||
CCDC assays | RNA transcript alone | 18.80 ± 0.31 | 21.96 ± 0.17 | 24.76 ± 0.18 | 28.06 ± 0.26 | 32.47 ± 0.79 | 36.16 ± 2.36 | −3.48 | 93.80 | ||
RNA transcript + other viruses | 18.67 ± 0.04 | 21.54 ± 0.11 | 24.79 ± 0.03 | 28.28 ± 0.04 | 31.09 ± 0.98 | 35.33 ± 0.59 | −3.30 | 100.92 |
r2 represents the correlation of coefficient between Ct values and quantities of RNA transcripts, ranging from 0-1, the value closer to 1 suggests higher linearity of the fitting curve between Ct values and quantities of RNA transcripts.
Slope was generated from the fitting plot between the copy number of RNA transcript and the corresponding Ct value by Excel 2010.
Efficiency = 10(−1/slope) − 1.
“RNA transcript” represents the in vitro transcribed RNA of the corresponding genes of SARS-CoV-2. “other viruses” represents the pooled RNA extracted from 15 human respiratory specimens by using Trizol. “RNA transcript + other viruses” represents a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of these two components.
Values shown are the mean of triplicate samples ± standard deviation.