Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;177(24):5658–5676. doi: 10.1111/bph.15288

TABLE 3.

Tg26 mice show no overt deficits in sensory and motor functions

Genotype Sex Body weight (g) Body temp. (°C) Spontaneous activity Righting reflex Bite irritability Pupil reflex Visual reflex Grip strength Wire maneuver
WT Male 37.4 ± 1.35 36.8 ± 0.16 2.2 ± 0.22 3.0 1.0 ± 0.35 1.00 ± 0.00 2.4 ± 0.27 2.8 ± 0.22 3.8 ± 0.22
Tg26 Male 29.8 ± 1.24* 36.9 ± 0.15 2.8 ± 0.22 3.0 1.2 ± 0.42 1.00 ± 0.00 2.8 ± 0.22 2.2 ± 0.22 3.4 ± 0.45
WT Female 26.0 ± 1.25 36.9 ± 0.28 2.8 ± 0.29 3.0 2.8 ± 0.29 0.75 ± 0.17 2.5 ± 0.33 2.0 ± 0.00 3.0 ± 0.00
Tg26 Female 22.3 ± 0.73* 37.0 ± 0.21 3.0 ± 0.00 3.0 2.5 ± 0.58 0.50 ± 0.00 2.5 ± 0.33 1.8 ± 0.29 3.5 ± 0.58

Note: Male and female Tg26 and littermate WT mice were assessed for differences in physiological, sensory, motor and reflexive responses by a modified SmithKline Beecham, Harwell, Imperial College, Royal London Hospital Phenotype Assessment screen (see section 2.4 for scoring criteria used). Both male and female Tg26 mice had lower body mass compared to their respective WT controls. n = 5 per each group; unpaired Student's t‐test. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

*

P < 0.05.