Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;61(12):1733–1746. doi: 10.1194/jlr.RA120001057

TABLE 3.

FA composition of total lipids from rat retina tissue following supplemented diets

Percent of Total FAs Control PL-EPA PL-DHA TG-EPA TG-DHA
14:0 0.16 ± 0.03 0.07 ± 0.01a 0.10 ± 0.05 0.16 ± 0.05 0.07 ± 0.02b,c
15:0 0.08 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01a 0.07 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01b,c
dma 16:0 0.88 ± 0.08 0.85 ± 0.08 0.86 ± 0.09 0.86 ± 0.1 0.83 ± 0.04
16:0 20.18 ± 0.58 16.47 ± 0.53d 17.78 ± 2.01a 18.65 ± 2.02 16.86 ± 0.86a
16:1n-9 0.21 ± 0.02 0.15 0.01b 0.17 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.01d
16:1n-7 0.37 ± 0.06 0.30 ± 0.05 0.36 ± 0.07 0.40 ± 0.12 0.26 ± 0.02b,e,f
17:0 0.15 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01a,g
dma 18:0 2.75 ± 0.08 2.83 ± 0.12 2.72 ± 0.11 2.76 ± 0.14 2.83 ± 0.11
dma 18:1n-9 0.41 ± 0.04 0.37 ± 0.04 0.37 ± 0.03 0.38 ± 0.03 0.36 ± 0.02
dma 18:1n-7 0.21 ± 0.03 0.22 ± 0.05 0.21 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.03 0.17 ± 0.02a,h
18:0 25.35 ± 0.56 24.80 ± 0.45c 24.94 ± 0.91 26.06 ± 0.86 25.46 ± 0.65
18:1t 0.05 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.0b,c,i
18:1n-9 9.16 ± 0.29 8.55 ± 0.46 8.48 ± 0.44a 9.05 ± 0.47 8.43 ± 0.35a
18:1n-7 2.48 ± 0.16 2.27 ± 0.18 2.23 ± 0.17 2.21 ± 0.15 1.90 ± 0.12d,h
18:2n-6 0.76 ± 0.11 0.87 ± 0.09 0.74 ± 0.1 0.92 ± 0.12 0.8 ± 0.06
20:0 0.11 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.02e,h,j 0.09 ± 0.01a
20:1n-9 0.17 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.0a 0.14 ± 0.02a 0.16 ± 0.03 0.17 ± 0.02
20:1n-7 0.04 ± 0.0 0.03 ± 0.01f 0.04 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.02
20:2n-6 0.09 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.01
20:3n-9 0.05 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.04 0.04 ± 0.01
20:3n-6 0.13 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.0d,g 0.13 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.01
20:4n-6 8.72 ± 0.31 8.10 ± 0.49 8.33 ± 0.23 7.86 ± 0.52b 7.85 ± 0.31b
20:5n-3 0.07 ± 0.02 0.42 ± 0.05d,i 0.27 ± 0.04 0.35 ± 0.04b 0.33 ± 0.05a
24:0 0.04 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.02b,k 0.04 ± 0.01
22:4n-6 1.24 ± 0.06 0.91 ± 0.06b 1.01 ± 0.08 0.90 ± 0.08d 0.90 ± 0.05d
22:5n-6 0.59 ± 0.1 0.10 ± 0.01d,l 0.14 ± 0.01a 0.13 ± 0.02b 0.15 ± 0.02
22:5n-3 0.34 ± 0.03 0.89 ± 0.06d,e 0.62 ± 0.05 0.88 ± 0.04d,e 0.67 ± 0.07
22:6n-3 25.09 ± 0.5 30.87 ± 1.28d 29.77 ± 1.65a 27.02 ± 1.61 31.15 ± 1.18c,d
Total of n-3 PUFAs 25.51 ± 0.5 32.19 ± 1.32d 30.67 ± 1.64a 28.25 ± 1.58 32.15 ± 1.11d
Total n-6 PUFAs 11.55 ± 0.39 10.27 ± 0.63a 10.44 ± 0.35 10.05 ± 0.60b 9.95 ± 0.40d
Total PUFAs 37.12 ± 0.60 42.51 ± 0.90d,f,l 41.17 ± 1.53a 38.38 ± 1.72 42.15 ± 0.89b
Total SFAs 46.11 ± 0.61 41.71 ± 0.71d,f 43.21 ± 1.43a 45.33 ± 1.30 42.70 ± 0.58a
Total MUFAs 12.51 ± 0.44 11.50 ± 0.68 11.47 ± 0.62 12.11 ± 0.67 10.97 ± 0.45d
n-6/n-3 PUFAs 0.45 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.03d 0.34 ± 0.03 0.36 ± 0.03 0.31 ± 0.02d

Values are mean ± SD (n = 8 rats per group). Probabilities were determined by Kruskal Wallis test followed by the Dunn’s post hoc test. DMA, dimethyl acetal; SFA, saturated FA.

a

P < 0.05 when the supplemented groups were compared with the control group.

b

P < 0.01 when the supplemented groups were compared with the control group.

c

P < 0.05 when the supplemented groups were compared with the TG-EPA group.

d

P < 0.001 when the supplemented groups were compared with the control group.

e

P < 0.05 when the supplemented groups were compared with the PL-DHA group.

f

P < 0.01 when the supplemented groups were compared with the TG-EPA group.

g

P < 0.001 when the supplemented groups were compared with the PL-DHA group.

h

P < 0.05 when the supplemented groups were compared with the PL-EPA group.

i

P < 0.01 when the supplemented groups were compared with the PL-DHA group.

j

P < 0.001 when the supplemented groups were compared with the TG-DHA group.

k

P < 0.01 when the supplemented groups were compared with the TG-DHA group.

l

P < 0.05 when the supplemented groups were compared with the TG-DHA group.