Table 1.
Urbana | Rurala | P-valueb | |
---|---|---|---|
N | 240 | 260 | |
Age | 54.6 (46.4–60.3) | 51.8 (44.3–60.1) | 0.193 |
Women | 57.9 | 60.4 | 0.575 |
Completed high school education | 46.7 | 15.8 | <0.0001 |
Per capita household income (¥1000) | 20.3 (12.4–34.0) | 12.8 (5.1–21.5) | <0.0001 |
Physical activity (METS/wk)c | 63.8 (18.9–111.8) | 130.5 (57.8–253.3) | <0.0001 |
Total energy intake (kcal)d | 1872.8 (1435.3–2293.7) | 1744.3 (1400.7–2188.79) | 0.112 |
Animal-source foods (%kcal)d | 24.0 (16.7–32.7) | 24.0 (14.8–33.9) | 0.862 |
Diet diversitye | 12.0 (10.0–14.0) | 10.0 (8.0–12.0) | <0.0001 |
We used a 12-component index with a continuous scale of 0–120 points to assess multiple aspects of urbanization, including population density, economic activity, transportation infrastructure, and sanitation. We dichotomized this urbanization index by median (=73.1) to define urban (76.1–99.6) and rural areas (39.2–73.1).
Urban-rural differences in categorical variables were assessed with χ2 and continuous variables were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Physical activity in metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs) per week was measured by 7-day recalls of all domestic, occupational, transportation, and leisure activities.
Nutrients intake was estimated using 3 consecutive 24-h recalls and household food inventories by trained interviewers, with total energy intake validated by doubly labeled water.
A count of number of food groups consumed, including staple grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts, eggs, meat, seafood, and dairy products.