Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0243161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243161

Table 2. Meta-regression analysis for different parameters.

Parameter Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
Type of study Prospective (2 studies) 32% (20–43%) 97% (94–99%)
Retrospective (2 studies) 82% (73–91%) 100% (100–100%)
Meta-regression P-value <0.01 <0.01
Homogenization Mechanical (2 studies) 82% (73–91%) 100% (100–100%)
No (2 studies) 32% (20–43%) 97% (94–99%)
Meta-regression P-vaule <0.01 <0.01
Sample pre-treatment With bead-beating (3 studies) 66% (38–93%) 98% (94–100%)
Without bead-beating (1 study) 43% (11–98%) 97% (91–100%)
Meta-regression P-vaule 0.39 0.03
Patient selection Consecutive (1 study) 43% (11–98%) 97% (91–100%)
Convenience (3 studies) 66% (38–93%) 98% (94–100%)
Meta-regression P-vaule 0.44 0.21

CI: confidence interval