Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 28;80(18):1901–1928. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01422-9

Table 4.

ORACLE-MS efficacy: key MRI endpoints [94]

Placebo [n = 206] Cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg [n = 206] Cladribine tablets 5.25 kg/mg [n = 204]
Time to conversion to clinically definite MS (Poser criteria)
 Risk reduction, % 67 62
 HR (95% CI) 0.33 (0.21–0.51) 0.38 (0.25–0.58)
 p value vs. placebo < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Cumulative percentage probability of clinically definite MS conversion, % 38.0 14.0 15.9
New or persisting T1 Gd+ lesions
 Median cumulative number of lesions (IQR) 2.0 (0.0–5.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0)
 Treatment group comparison: cladribine/placebo, ratio (95% CI)a 0.108 (0.55–0.210)b
 Risk reduction vs. placebo, % 89.3
New or enlarging T2 lesions
 Median cumulative number of lesions (IQR) 2.0 (0.0–8.0) 0.0 (0.0–2.0)
 Treatment group comparison: cladribine/placebo, ratio (95% CI)a 0.212 (0.152–0.295)
 Risk reduction vs. placebo, % 78.8
Combined unique active lesions
 Median cumulative number of lesions (IQR) 4.0 (1.0–13.5) 1.0 (0.0–3.0)
 Treatment group comparison: cladribine/placebo, ratio (95% CI)a 0.157 (0.098–0.251)
 Risk reduction vs. placebo, % 84.3

Data are for the double-blind treatment period (i.e. from randomization to the end of the double-blind period, which was at 96 weeks, or earlier if a diagnosis of MS was made)

CI confidence interval, Gd + gadolinium-enhancing, HR hazard ratio, IQR interquartile range, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, MS multiple sclerosis

aFrom the analysis of the cumulative number of lesions, using a negative binomial model with treatment, region, treatment × region, and baseline lesion count as covariates, and the log number of scans as an offset variable

bp < 0.0001 versus placebo from the Wald Chi-square test