Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;8(3):e399–e410. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30546-7

Table 2.

Prevalence of use of contraceptive methods at 12 months post partum

Intervention (n=252) Control (n=267) Adjusted PR (95% CI)*
Modern and appropriate methods 115 (46%) 94 (35%) 1·58 (0·74–3·38)
Long-acting or permanent methods 56 (22%) 18 (7%) 4·47 (2·05–9·74)
Implant 55 (22%) 16 (6%) 4·36 (1·96–9·70)
Intrauterine device 1 (<1%) 2 (1%) 0·53 (0·49–2·05)
Female sterilisation 0 0 0
Vasectomy 0 0 0
Short-acting methods 59 (23%) 76 (28%) 0·92 (0·29–2·98)
Injectable 20 (8%) 23 (9%) 1·20 (0·31–4·60)
Pill 12 (5%) 22 (9%) 0·75 (0·29–1·95)
Male condom 27 (11%) 27 (10%) 1·02 (0·31–3·40)
Female condom 0 0 0
Emergency contraception 0 4 (2%) 0
Spermicide 0 0 0
Non-modern or inappropriate methods 18 (7%) 47 (18%) 0·45 (0·13–1·54)
Lactational amenorrhoea method 0 0 0
Withdrawal 2 (1%) 9 (3%) 0·09 (0·02–0·49)
Abstinence 2 (1%) 3 (1%) 1·81 (0·15–22·44)
Standard-day method 11 (4%) 32 (12%) 0·38 (0·08–0·31)
Others 3 (1%) 3 (1%) 0·99 (0·03–34·68)
No method 119 (47%) 126 (47%) 0·84 (0·31–2·24)

Data are n (%). PR=prevalence ratio.

*

Accounting for clustering effect and adjusted for living setting, education level, employment, and usual travel time to health centre.

Adjusting for clustering effect not possible.

Two-sided p value Fisher's exact test >0·05.