Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2020 Jun 23;47(9):4125–4136. doi: 10.1002/mp.14308

Table III.

LASSO-SVM model prediction results in terms of area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (Acc), false positive rate (FPR) and true positive rate (TPR). Performance on the training set summarizes predictions of the 10×10-fold CV loops for the model based on no-harmonized features (“without harmonization”) and the one based on harmonized features (“with harmonization”). External-validation results are instead subdivided according to the three scenarios performed (A, B and C).

Cross-validation External validation

  no-harmonized features harmonized features scenario A scenario B scenario C
AUC
(95% CI)
0.90
(0.85–0.96)
0.89
0.84–0.95)
0.86
(0.78–0.95)
0.86
(0.77–0.95)
0.86
(0.77–0.95)
Acc [%] 78.7 80.5 79.1 81.9 79.1
FPR [%] 21.9 20.0 35.5 25.9 32.3
TPR [%] 79.3 81.0 90.0 87.8 87.8