Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2020 Jun 29;143:105857. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105857

Table 5.

Estimated low-dose lifetime extra bladder and lung cancer risks versus dose and equivalent drinking water inorganic arsenic concentration (per 10,000)a extrapolated from data in Chen et al. (2010a, b) using constrained and unconstrained model averaging.

Extra Risk Average daily inorganic arsenic dose (µg/kg-day)
0.064 0.071b 0.12 0.19 0.26 0.33 0.75 1.45

Equivalent daily drinking water inorganic arsenic concentration (µg/L)
1 1.5 5 10 15 20 50 100
Bladder Cancer
Constrained Models
Mean −0.1 0.0 0.5 1.2 2.0 2.7 7.3 15.5
97.5th percentile −0.2 0.0 1.7 4.1 6.6 9.0 23.6 47.9
Unconstrained Models
Mean −0.5 0.0 2.7 4.8 7.0 9.0 17.7 29.5
97.5th percentile −1.3 0.0 6.3 10.3 14.2 17.7 32.1 51.4
Lung Cancer
Constrained Models
Mean −0.1 0.0 0.4 0.9 1.5 2.0 5.2 10.4
97.5th percentile −0.2 0.0 1.5 3.6 5.6 7.7 19.8 39.0
Unconstrained Models
Mean −1.1 0.0 5.3 7.6 10.0 11.9 19.4 28.4
97.5th percentile −7.0 0.0 32.0 43.0 54.0 63.0 91.0 119
a

These extra risk estimates are estimated based on model-estimated background rates for the constrained and unconstrained models of 4.2X10−3 and 2.4X10−3 respectively for bladder cancer and 2.3X10−2 and 2.0X10−2 respectively for lung cancer (Table 4).

b

To illustrate model uncertainty when extrapolating from the Chen et al. (2010a, b) study data to much lower arsenic doses, the background level of exposure population, specifically 0.071 µg/kg-day (see Section 3.2.1).