Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;10:20964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78007-9

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Expression patterns of ScWRKY5 under different stresses as determined by qRT-PCR. (A) Relative expression of ScWRKY5 in 4-month-old ROC22 plantlets under plant hormone stress. SA, salicylic acid (5 mM); MeJA, methyl jasmonate (25 µM); ABA, abscisic acid (100 µM). (B) Relative expression of ScWRKY5 in 4-month-old ROC22 plantlets under abiotic stress. NaCl, sodium chloride (simulating salt stress) (250 mM); PEG, polyethylene glycol (simulating drought treatment) (25%). (C) Relative expression of ScWRKY5 in sugarcane after inoculation with Sporisorium scitamineum. YZ01-1413, LC05-136, and Yacheng05-179 were smut-resistant sugarcane varieties (R). ROC22, YZ03-103, and FN40 were smut-susceptible sugarcane varieties (S). dpi, days post-inoculation. Data are normalized to the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression level. All of the data points are means ± standard error (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple range test (p-value < 0.05).