Table 3.
Difference and preference tests of rice cupcakes prepared from Hopyeong and Singil RS4 rice flours
Attributes | Rice flours1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHRF | CHRF40 | CHRF50 | NSRF | CSRF40 | CSRF50 | |
Difference test | ||||||
Surface color | 6.90 ± 1.47a2 | 6.63 ± 1.71a | 6.77 ± 1.65a | 6.60 ± 1.63a | 6.63 ± 2.22a | 5.47 ± 2.27b |
Crumb color | 4.23 ± 1.59 | 4.90 ± 1.93 | 5.17 ± 1.98 | 4.43 ± 2.40 | 4.90 ± 2.40 | 4.30 ± 2.18 |
Air cell uniformity | 5.40 ± 1.57bc | 6.53 ± 1.85a | 6.63 ± 1.85a | 5.83 ± 1.95ab | 4.70 ± 2.32c | 3.47 ± 2.00d |
Volume | 5.67 ± 1.58ab | 6.37 ± 1.61ab | 6.60 ± 1.50a | 5.47 ± 1.33b | 5.43 ± 2.45b | 3.73 ± 1.95c |
Sweetness | 4.97 ± 1.56b | 4.97 ± 1.92b | 4.60 ± 1.54b | 5.03 ± 1.61b | 6.50 ± 1.80a | 2.30 ± 0.08b |
Hardness | 4.10 ± 1.90bc) | 4.60 ± 1.90b | 5.50 ± 1.83a | 3.60 ± 1.48 cd | 2.87 ± 1.61d | 4.00 ± 1.70bc |
Elasticity | 6.40 ± 1.69b | 4.67 ± 1.45c | 3.77 ± 1.83d | 6.17 ± 1.58b | 7.73 ± 1.11a | 6.03 ± 1.56b |
Moistness | 4.70 ± 1.78c | 3.40 ± 1.45d | 2.80 ± 1.71d | 5.00 ± 1.82bc | 7.20 ± 1.90a | 5.73 ± 2.21b |
Softness | 5.47 ± 1.55b | 4.07 ± 1.23c | 3.37 ± 1.57c | 5.80 ± 1.61b | 7.50 ± 1.07a | 5.93 ± 1.86b |
Preference test | ||||||
Appearance | 6.17 ± 1.70a | 6.97 ± 1.52a | 6.37 ± 1.90a | 5.90 ± 1.69ab | 4.93 ± 2.00bc | 4.77 ± 2.58c |
Flavor | 6.23 ± 2.03 | 6.03 ± 1.71 | 6.03 ± 1.85 | 5.87 ± 1.68 | 5.93 ± 2.18 | 5.67 ± 1.63 |
Taste | 5.50 ± 1.81bc | 4.63 ± 1.65 cd | 4.23 ± 1.68d | 5.87 ± 1.38b | 7.07 ± 2.08a | 6.03 ± 1.63b |
Texture | 5.23 ± 1.74b | 4.13 ± 1.57c | 3.20 ± 1.94d | 5.87 ± 1.67b | 7.03 ± 1.85a | 5.52 ± 1.60b |
Overall quality | 5.33 ± 1.94b | 4.77 ± 1.45bc | 3.93 ± 1.78c | 5.57 ± 1.68b | 6.67 ± 1.94a | 5.43 ± 1.60b |
Data represents mean ± SD
1Rice flours are composed of native Hopyrong rice flour (NHRF), cross-linked Hopyeong rice flour (CHRF), native Singil rice flour (NSRF), and cross-linked Singil rice flour (CSRF). 40 and 50 mean flour percentage of flour slurries during cross-linking
2Values in the same column with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test