Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;10:20942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77824-2

Table 2.

A comparison of the performance of the proposed model, XG-ac4C, with the existing computational model PACES.

Dataset Method ROC PRC
Cross-validation PACES 0.885 0.559
XG-ac4C 0.91 0.653
Indenpendent-test PACES 0.874 0.485
XG-ac4C 0.889 0.581