Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;20:1846. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09904-x

Table 2.

Responses to quantitative acceptability questions on intervention helpfulness among n = 36 participants in the EMERGE feasibility randomized clinical trial by group and total

Acceptability question Study Group Total
Experimental Comparison
Number of enrolled participants who were randomized 19 19 38
Number of randomized participants who completed a post-intervention assessment of acceptability 17 19 36
Extent of liking the interventiona
 Liked a lot 100% 84% 92%
 Somewhat liked 0 11% 6%
 Did not like 0 5% 3%
Helpfulness in improving income-earning ability
 Very helpful 53% 47% 50%
 Somewhat helpful 47% 37% 42%
 Not helpful 0 16% 8%
Helpfulness in improving ability to prevent HIV
 Very helpful 82% 74% 78%
 Somewhat helpful 12% 16% 14%
 Not helpful 6% 11% 8%
Likelihood of recommending intervention to a friend
 Very likely 100% 84% 92%
 Somewhat likely 0 16% 8%
 Not likely 0 0 0
Applied to any of interventions’ texted job announcements
 Yes 24% 47% 36%
 No 76% 53% 64%
Received any interventions’ texted jobs after applyingb
 Yes 0 22% 15%
 No 0 78% 85%
Preference for future number of text messages received
 Equal 71% 53% 61%
 More 12% 21% 17%
 Fewer 18% 26% 22%
Extent of liking weekly text message survey
 Liked a lot 35% 47% 42%
 Somewhat liked 59% 47% 53%
 Did not like 6% 5% 6%
Ease of responding to weekly text message survey
 Very easy 82% 84% 83%
 Somewhat easy 12% 11% 11%
 Not easy 6% 5% 6%

[a] Refers to job announcements only for comparison intervention and job announcement plus microenterprise activities for experimental intervention; [b] Denominator includes only participants who applied to one or more texted job announcements