Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;20:319. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01339-z

Table 1.

Overall performance in CV

Method Parameters Feature level Task level
d λ QH@5 WQH@5 NH1@1 NH2@1 NH3@1 NH5@1 NHall@1
PLTR 10 2.665_±0.07 3.136±0.12 0.605±0.03 0.701±0.04 0.713±0.05 0.725±0.05 0.683±0.04
10 2.647±0.08 3.191_±0.14 0.599±0.03 0.677±0.04 0.707±0.04 0.725±0.05 0.677±0.04
10 2.569±0.08 2.957±0.11 0.635±0.03 0.707±0.04 0.689±0.05 0.719±0.04 0.653±0.04
10 2.623±0.06 3.073±0.09 0.623±0.03 0.713_±0.05 0.707±0.04 0.719±0.04 0.671±0.04
50 2.467±0.07 2.992±0.11 0.605±0.03 0.695±0.04 0.725±0.06 0.725±0.04 0.653±0.04
30 2.491±0.07 3.080±0.14 0.563±0.04 0.689±0.05 0.713±0.04 0.749±0.04 0.689±0.03
PLTRh 10 2.599 ± 0.09 3.111 ± 0.12 0.623 ± 0.02 0.671 ± 0.03 0.713 ± 0.03 0.719 ± 0.04 0.707 ± 0.03
10 2.575±0.08 3.115 ± 0.13 0.623 ± 0.03 0.677 ± 0.03 0.737 ± 0.04 0.749 ± 0.03 0.695 ± 0.03
10 2.419±0.09 2.827±0.12 0.647_ ± 0.03 0.695 ± 0.03 0.671 ± 0.03 0.707 ± 0.03 0.635 ± 0.03
30 2.138±0.10 2.583±0.18 0.629±0.02 0.701±0.02 0.695 ± 0.03 0.695 ± 0.04 0.593 ± 0.05
50 2.102±0.07 2.470±0.10 0.533±0.03 0.677±0.03 0.743_ ± 0.04 0.754 ± 0.03 0.629 ± 0.05
30 2.281±0.07 2.768±0.18 0.563±0.03 0.689±0.03 0.707 ± 0.04 0.760 ± 0.05 0.701 ± 0.05
KRL 2 2.102 ± 0.26 2.167 ± 0.37 0.569 ± 0.03 0.611 ± 0.05 0.635 ± 0.04 0.683 ± 0.03 0.689 ± 0.07
1.5 2.078 ± 0.15 2.143 ± 0.25 0.503 ± 0.04 0.575 ± 0.05 0.617 ± 0.05 0.677 ± 0.04 0.760_ ± 0.06
BMTMKL 2.443 ± 0.12 2.614 ± 0.20 0.413 ± 0.07 0.491 ± 0.08 0.593 ± 0.05 0.784_ ± 0.05 0.749 ± 0.05

The column “d” corresponds to the latent dimension. The numbers in the form of x±y represent the mean (x) and standard deviation (y). The best performance of each method is in italic. The best performance under each evaluation metric is underlined