Table 1.
First author | Country | Year | Sample size | Mean age (year) | Sexa | IgG prevalence (%) | IgM prevalence (%) | Genotype | PCR prevalence | Method | Study design | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case | Control | Male | Female | Case | Control | Case | Control | |||||||||
Ghwass | Egypt | 2016 | 55 | 6.2± 13.25 | 29 | 26 | 18.2 | 14.5 | – | – | ELISA | CS | [19] | |||
Slavov | Brazil | 2012 | 39 | 100 |
23.56 (range: 3–45) |
59% | 41% | 35.9 | 60 | – | 1A | 15.3 | sequencing, ELISA, qPCR, | CS | [20] | |
Kishore | India | 2011 | 90 | 32 | 8 (range 2-18) | 55 | 35 | 81 | 21 | 41.1 | 6.2 | – | – | ELISA | CS | [21] |
Arabzadeh | Iran | 2017 | 150 | 30.4 | 75 | 75 | – | – | I | 4 | Real-time PCR | CS | [22] |
aSome studies reported the number of male/female and another reported percentage
PCR polymerase chain reaction, CS cross-sectional, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, qPCR quantitative PCR