Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Implant Dent. 2017 Feb;26(1):12–23. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000538

Table 5.

Chemical Treatment Comparison Cell Count Results

Group 1C (Alcohol) Group 2C (Alc + PBS) Group 3C (CHX) Group 4C (CHX + PBS) Group 5C (Alc + PBS + UV) Group 6C (CHX + PBS + UV) Group 7C (Steam)
Disc
 1 50,000 48,750 500 1250 44,750 250 83,750
 2 52,500 46,250 250 1500 37,250 250 80,000
 3 48,750 41,000 250 3500 41,500 250 57,750
Average 50,416.67 45,333.33 333.33 2083.33 41,166.67 250 73,833.33
SD 1909.41 3955.48 144.34 1233.22 3761.09 0 14,054.21
P 0.12 0.05 7.0 × 10−13 1.5 × 10−10 0.022* 4.0 × 10−13

Twenty thousand cells were plated and counted after 1 week. Groups treated with chlorhexidine had statistically significantly lower cell proliferation as compared with the group treated with steam. P value—all groups compared with group 7C.

*

Significant at P < 0.05.

Significant at P < 0.01.

Significant at P < 0.001.