Table 1.
Entry | Carbon Nanomaterial | Properties | Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carbon dot | D 1 = 0, strong optical absorption in the UV region (260–320 nm) | Low toxicity, excellent photoluminescence, good hydrophilicity, small size (below 10 nm), easy synthesis, good electrochemiluminescence, high stability in physiological media, good fluorescent property, biocompatible | Low solubility in physiological media, aggregation |
2 | Fullerene | D = 0, H 2 = mostly sp2, E.S.A. 3 = 80–90, T.C. 4 = 0.4, E.C. 5 = 10−10, T 6 = elastic, hardness = hard | Low toxicity, biocompatible | Low solubility in physiological media, aggregation |
3 | Carbon nanotube | D = 1, H = mostly sp2, E.S.A. = ~1300, T.C. = 3500, E.C. = structure-dependent, T = flexible, elastic, hardness = hard | Low toxicity, high conductivity, high chemical stability and sensitivity, high electron-transfer rate, biocompatible, strong NIR light absorption | Low solubility in physiological media, aggregation, low homogeneous size |
4 | Graphene | D = 2, H = sp2, E.S.A. = ~1500, T.C. = 4850–5300, E.C. = ~2000, T = flexible, elastic, hardness = uppermost | Low toxicity, high sensitivity, large surface area, inherent size- and shape-dependent optical properties, unique physicochemical behavior, biocompatible | Low solubility in physiological media, aggregation |
1 D = dimensions, 2 H = hybridization, 3 E.S.A. = experimental specific surface area (m2 g−1); 4 T.C. = thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1); 5 E.C. = electrical conductivity (S cm−1); 6 T = tenacity.