Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;9:290. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_268_20

Table 2.

The prevalence of problematic use of mobile phone

Author Scale Population Age range/mean (SD) of the statistical population Sample size Sampling method Prevalence rate
Khazaei et al., 2012[50] Cell Phone Addiction Scale (Koo, 2009) Students of Birjand City 15-20 years 637 Cluster sampling 1.2% addiction
3.4%
severe 95.% moderate
Khazaeib et al., 2013[49] Cell Phone Addiction Scale (Koo, 2009) Students of Islamic Azad University, Birjand Branch Mean: 22.16
SD: 3.39
312
males: 200
Females: 112
Systematic random sampling 1.9% addiction
7.4% severe
90% moderate
Khazaeia et al., 2013[51] Cell Phone Addiction Scale (Koo, 2009) Students of Birjand University of Medical Sciences Mean: 17.5
SD: 1.75
697
males: 280
Females: 417
Systematic random sampling 0.9% addiction
6%
severe 93% moderate
Mansourian et al., 2014[41] Mobile Phone Addiction Index (Leung, 2007) Students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Not explicated 405
males: 135
Females: 270
Stratified sampling method 25.4% severe 50.4% moderate 24.2% low
Yahyazadeh et al., 2016[53] Smartphone Addiction Scale (Kwon, 2013) Nursing students of Medical Sciences Universities in Tehran Mean: 21.47
SD: 7.12
150 Quota cluster method 9.3% addiction
Akbari et al., 2016[29] Cell-Phone Over-Use Scale (Jenaro et al., 2007) Students of Neyshapour University of Medical Sciences Mean: 20.4
SD: 1.6
230
93 males
137 females
Not reported 8.7% high
80.5% moderate
10.8% low
Atadokht 2016[58] Cell-Phone Over-Use Scale (Jenaro et al., 2007) Students of Mohaghegh Ardabili University Mean: 21.45
SD: 2.41
400
200 males
200 females
Cluster random sampling 5.5% high
81.5% moderate
13% low
Sayyah et al., 2016[27] Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (Bianchi and Phillips, 2005) Students of Ahvaz Joundishapour University of Medical Sciences Not reported 195
95 males
100 females
Cluster random sampling 18.5% high
67.2% moderate
14.4% low
Babadi-Akashe et al., 2014[30] Questionnaire of behavior associated with mobile phone use (Hooper and Zhou, 2007) Students of Shahrekord Payame Noor University, Islamic Azad University, and University of Medical Sciences Not reported 296 students
57.10% male,
49.90% female
Randomly Habitual behaviors (21.49%), addiction (21.49%), intentional (21.49%)
Mazaheri et al., 2014[43] Mobile phone Addiction Index (Leung, 2008) Isfahan University of Medical Sciences students Mean: 20.96
SD: 2.32
1180 students
65.5% female
34.5% male
Convenience Addiction
56.2% for female
64.5% for male
Norouzi Parashkouh et al., 2016[48] Cell-Phone Over-Use Scale (Jenaro et al., 2007) High school students in Rasht Mean: 16.28
SD: 1.01
581 students
53.5% female
46.5% male
Stratified sampling method 103 (7/17%) high
451 (6/77%) moderate
27 (6/4%) low
Barati et al., 2016[40] Cell-Phone Over-Use Scale (Jenaro et al., 2007) Students living in dormitories at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Mean: 21.3
SD: 2.1
300 students
60% female
40% men
Stratified sampling method 32% high
26.8% moderate
41.2% low
Alavi et al., 2016[32] Semi- structure Interview for Mobile Phone Addiction Diagnosis students of Tehran universities Mean: 24.06
SD: 4.8
250 students
51.2% female
48.8% male
Not reported 13% were addicted
Mohammadbeigi et al., 2016[55] Cell-Phone Over-Use Scale (Jenaro et al., 2007) students of Qom University of Medical Sciences Mean: 21. 8
SD: 3.2
380 students
69.5% female
30.5% male
Proportional stratified sampling Over-use=10.7%
Eyvazlou et al., 2016[28] Cell-Phone Over-Use Scale (Jenaro et al., 2007) Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) students in five universities of medical sciences in the North East of Iran Mean: 20.4
SD: 1.6
450 students
64% female
36% male
Not reported 4.6% Overuse 84.6% moderate 10.8% low
Pourrazavi et al., 2014[44] Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (Bianchi and Phillips, 2005) Universities students in Tabriz 18-33 years 476 students
285 females
190 males
2-stage random sampling 128 (26/9%) over users
52.3% (67/128) male

SD=Standard deviation