Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;184(1):167–178. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0073

Table 2.

Comparison of different immunoassays. Median aldosterone concentration before (0 h) and after (4 h) saline infusion by RIA (n = 81) and chemoluminescence assay (CLIA, n = 106). Data are given as median and interquartile range. PA subtypes (APA and BAH) were not definitively determined in 22 patients with PA.

n Aldosterone (ng/L) during the SIT
0 h 4 h
Coat-a-count® RIA IDS-iSYS aldosterone® CLIA P-value Coat-a-count® RIA IDS-iSYS aldosterone® CLIA P-value
EH 84 92 (71–131) 86 (44–146) 0.414 33 (25–48) 37 (37–40) 0.195
PA 103 210* (147–313) 265* (158–384) 0.235 120* (80–190) 171* (101–246) 0.027
 APA 57 192 (146–367) 269 (183–376) 0.092 154 (77–191) 175 (119–329) 0.109
 BAH 24 153 (139–292) 276 (157–387) 0.290 111 (79–154) 171 (98–242) 0.108

*P < 0.001 vs EH (Mann-WhitneyU-test).

APA, aldosterone-producing adenoma (RIA: n = 23, CLIA: n = 34); BAH, bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (RIA: n = 9, CLIA: n = 15); EH, essential hypertension (RIA: n = 37, CLIA: n = 47); PA, primary aldosteronism (RIA: n = 44, CLIA: n = 59).