Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;99(48):e23259. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023259

Table 3.

Comparison of the change in parameters between the 2 FDG PET/CT scans according to patients’ HIV serostatus.

HIV
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Change in parameters Yes (n = 18) No (n = 34) t P
Weight (kg) 2.77 ± 5.92 4.49 ± 10.41 −0.648 .520
BMI (kg/m2) 1.03 ± 2.10 1.75 ± 3.86 −0.738 .464
FBS (mmol/L) 0.05 ± 1.2 −0.63 ± 2.21 1.203 .235
Administered FDG (mCi) −0.26 ± 1.37 0.55 ± 1.55 −1.875 .067
Ascending aorta
 SUVmax 0.02 ± 0.81 −0.04 ± 0.94 0.208 .836
 TBR 0.07 ± 0.42 0.05 ± 0.61 0.085 .933
Carotid artery
 SUVmax −0.13 ± 0.59 0.06 ± 0.92 −0.803 .426
 TBR 0.01 ± 0.46 0.00 ± 0.57 0.087 .931
Abdominal aorta
 SUVmax −0.18 ± 1.08 −0.15 ± 0.72 −0.122 .904
 TBR −0.06 ± 0.66 −0.16 ± 0.62 0.519 .606
Femoral artery
 SUVmax −0.10 ± 0.36 0.09 ± 0.63 −1.166 .249
 TBR −0.05 ± 0.45 0.18 ± 0.53 −1.548 .128