Table 1:
Validated BE early detection markers
Biomarker | Method | Study Design | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFF3 | IHC (cytosponge) | BEST-2: Case-control (N=1110) | 80% | 92% | 42 | |
mVIM and mCCNA1 | bsNSG (Esocheck device) | Case-control Validation cohort (N=86) | 90% | 92% | 36 | |
mB3GAT2 | methyLight PCR (endoscopic brushings) | Case-control Validation cohort (N=66) | 0.95 | 80% | 86% | 37 |
mZNF793 | methyLight PCR (endoscopic brushings) | Case-control Validation cohort (N=66) | 0.96 | 80% | 93% | 37 |
mTFPI2 | methyLight PCR (cytosponge) | Case-control Validation cohort (N=278) | 0.88 (0.84–0.91 | 82% | 96% | 41 |
mTWIST1 | methyLight PCR (cytosponge) | Case-control validation cohort (N=278) | 81% (0.77–0.86) | 70% | 93% | 41 |
IHC=immunohistochemistry, bsNSG=bisulfite next generation sequencing
Table 1 below summarizes BE biomarkers that have been evaluated in clinical cohorts.