Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Oct 22;29(12):2486–2494. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0223

Table 2:

Candidate BE risk stratification markers

Biomarker Study Design Sample Size Outcome
Abnormal DNA ploidy, 9pLOH, 17pLOH34 Prospective Cohort N=243 RR=38.7
(95% CI 10.8–138.5)
Aneuploidy, tetraploidy60 Retrospective analysis N=322 RR=11 (95% CI 5.5–21)
LOH by FISH: 17p13.161 Retrospective analysis of surveillance cohort N=151 5% of NDBE
9% of LGD
46% of HGD
CNA and LOH by FISH: Prospective N=138 LGD: sens 70%, spec 89%
8q24, 9p21, 17q11.2, and 20q13.262 HGD: sens 84%, spec 93%
EAC: sens 94%, spec 93%
Hypermethylation of CDKN2A, RUNX3, HPP163 Retrospective and longitudinal N=53 CDKN2A OR 1.74
RUNX3 OR 1.8
HPP1 OR 1.77
Jin methylated gene panel64 Retrospective, multi-center, double-blinded N=50 progressors AUC=0.843 at 2 years
N=145 non-progressors AUC=0.829 at 4 years
Tissue Cypher59 Case-Control multi-center N=145 non-processors, N=45 progressors OR 9.4 High vs. Low risk (95% CI 2.65, 33.28) OR 2.35 Intermediate vs. Low risk (95% CI 0.66, 8.41)