Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;33(9):108467. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108467

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Spatial Patterning of Rho Activity Dynamics

(A) Schematic representation of the cellular automata model. Reactions (left) are simulated within individual discrete regions. Mass transfer between these regions is simulated based on fast and slow diffusive mobility of the cytosolic and plasma membrane-associated components (center). Cytosolic and plasma membrane regions of cells are represented by two 2-dimensional (2D) arrays of discrete spatial regions (right).

(B) Experimentally observed Rho activity sensor signals in U2OS cells obtained via TIRF microscopy (left panels) and numerical simulations of Rho activity obtained by using a cellular automata model (right panels). Top panels: representative time frame from experiments and simulations (see also Video S6); bottom panels: kymographs corresponding to white lines in top panels. Cells co-express the Rhotekin-GBD sensor and GEF-H1(C53R). The representative cell shown in this panel expresses GEF-H1(C53R) at low levels.

(C) Measurement of spatial Rho activity pulse width by fitting a 2D Gaussian to the spatial autocorrelation function of cellular automata simulations. Shown is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Gaussian fit from simulations performed after multiplying diffusion coefficients with varying factors (mean and SD from 8 independent simulations).

(D) Example for experimental observation of 2 focused wave fragments that fuse and change their shape and propagation direction. Cells co-express the mCherry-Rhotekin-GBD sensor and EGFP-GEF-H1. The representative cell shown in this panel expresses GEF-H1 at intermediate levels (see also Video S7).

(E) Cellular automata simulation of Rho activity dynamics shows similar activity patterns as shown in (D).

Scale bars: 10 μm.