Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2019 Jan 8;50(1):96–106. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003999

Table 1.

Sample demographics, clinical indices, and performance on the dot-probe task, by group and time-point of data collection

Age 10a Age 13b Total
Low BI n = 28 High BI n = 33 Low BI n = 29 High BI n = 35 Low BI n = 39 High BI n = 48
Demographics
 Sex (% female) 57.1% 60.6% 59.3% 56.8% 58.2% 58.6%
 Age (years) 10.42 (0.40) 10.58 (0.45) 13.09 (0.68) 13.00 (0.64) 11.72 (1.47) 11.93 (1.42)
 IQ 114.40 (12.57) 115.85 (12.40) 115.26 (13.76) 117.81 (13.35) 114.82 (13.05) 116.89 (12.86)
Clinical indices
 BI scores −0.59 (0.42) 0.55 (0.49) −0.56 (0.48) 0.49 (0.46) −0.58 (0.45) 0.52 (0.47)
 SCARED 18.29 (9.39) 14.67 (7.80) 11.24 (7.68) 10.32 (6.72) 14.83 (9.22) 12.37 (7.52)
 Current anxiety dx (n) 1 3 5 4 6 7
 Dot-probe performance
 Threat bias (ms) 0.38 (30.31) 6.54 (31.18) 9.47 (21.94) 12.00 (37.83) 4.85 (27.85) 9.42 (34.02)
 Happy bias (ms) 9.50 (30.74) −0.25 (30.74) −1.45 (26.17) 7.73 (36.00) 4.13 (29.87) 3.97 (32.62)
 ABV threat 0.047 (0.020) 0.048 (0.021) 0.046 (0.016) 0.048 (0.019) 0.046 (0.018) 0.048 (0.020)
 ABV happy 0.041 (0.015) 0.050 (0.014) 0.052 (0.021) 0.048 (0.020) 0.046 (0.019) 0.049 (0.017)

BI, behavioral inhibition; SCARED, Screen for Childhood Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (total scores); dx, diagnosis; ABV, attention bias variability.

At age 10 and 13, BI scores significantly differed between the low- and high-BI groups, whereas the other factors did not (see text).

a

n = 23 provided data only at age 10.

b

n = 26 provided data only at age 13.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure