Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 8;17(2):341–367. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5783

Table 3.

Comparisons of gEUD calculations (target volumes and normal tissues) for TG‐166 test cases between TPS results and those obtained from Mobius3D and COMPASS

Differences (%)
TPS Values M3D CC CR
Benchmark Phantom
PTV Rectangle (as target) 73.6
0.8
0.1
0.3
PTV Rectangle (as normal tissue) 56.1 0.7 1.0 0.7
Rectangle 1 (as target) 72.1
1.2
0.2
0.1
Rectangle 1 (as normal tissue) 55.7 1.1
2.2
2.4
Rectangle 2 50.1
0.4
1.4 1.5
Triangle 1 40.9 2 2.6 2.7
Head & Neck
PTV 70 72.2 0.0 0.0
1.0
PTV 54 59,4
1.0
1.1
1.7
PTV 50 52.9
4.2
0.4
3.3
Cord 35.5
0.9
0.7
1.1
Left Parotid 20.4 0.8 5.2
2.6
Right Parotid 19.9
3.4
1.6
5.0
Mandible 45.3 6.9 2.4 0.5
Prostate
PTV 69.7 0.3 0.4 0.7
Rectum 42.7 4.1 0.9 4.3
Bladder 43.1
1.3
0.2
2.6
Left Femoral Head 13.9 0.1 3.6 1.0
Right Femoral Head 14.2
0.5
2.4 1.7
Pubic Bone 39.6 2.8 3.4
1.9
Brain
GTV 54 56.3
0.3
0.2 0.0
PTV 50.4 54.5 0.9 0.1
0.2
Brain Stem 41.5 0.3
0.8
1.1
Optic Chiasm 46.5
0.8
0.0
2.5
Left Eye 11.0 0.0 1.6
7.7
Right Eye 11.1
0.8
1.6
2.6
Left Optic Nerve 29.5 7.4 1.5
8.3
Right Optic Nerve 33.8 3.2 2.6
6.0
Left Inner Ear 35.2 8.8 3.2 5.3
Right Inner Ear 43.5 9.3 4.0 5.5
M3D vs. CC M3D vs. CR CC vs. CR
p‐values 0.93
<0.05
<0.05

M3D=Mobius3D; CC=COMPASS dose calculation; CR=COMPASS dose reconstruction.