Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 14;8(4):485. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040485

Table 3.

Correlation and inferential analysis between the Angle class and the foot’s biomechanics.

Foot’s Biomechanics Right Molar
p-Value
Left Molar
p-Value
Right Canine
p-Value
Left Canine
p-Value
Right FPI 0.209 0.061 0.115 0.244
Left FPI 0.159 0.036 * 0.318 0.502
Right scaphoid height 0.565 0.643 0.048 * 0.148
Left scaphoid height 0.585 0.278 0.981 0.739
Right global strength 0.780 0.871 0.110 0.079
Left global strength 0.780 0.871 0.110 0.079
Pressure 1° right metatarsal 0.053 0.021 0.229 0.450
Pressure 1° left metatarsal 0.937 0.541 0.850 0.411
Pressure 5° right metatarsal 0.096 0.001 0.718 0.219
Pressure 5° left metatarsal 0.180 0.270 0.550 0.720
Right heel pressure 0.013 0.558 0.045 * 0.045 *
Left heel pressure 0.270 0.098 0.100 0.673
Right heel support phase 0.264 0.334 0.334 0.530
Left heel support phase 0.647 0.824 0.008 ** 0.133
Right plantigrade phase 0.320 0.007 ** 0.009 ** 0.024 *
Left plantigrade phase 0.256 0.021 ** 0.050 * 0.029 *
Right propulsive phase 0.402 0.699 0.323 0.735
Left propulsive phase 0.001 ** 0.005 ** 0.003 ** 0.173
Right contact surface 0.014 * 0.044 * 0.191 0.284
Left contact surface 0.001 ** 0.011 * 0.030 * 0.007 **
Centre of gravity 0.0001 *** 0.0001 *** 0.0001 *** 0.0001 ***

FPI—Foot Posture Index, * Kruskal–Wallis Test. Significance set at p < 0.05. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.