Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;8(4):105. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040105

Table 2.

The impact of electronic cigarettes use and tobacco smoke exposure on MetS.

Type of Study Participants/Rodents/Type of Cells Country Exposure Assessment Results Reference
E-CIGARETTES
Human Participants of the constancies cohort
(n = 18,300, aged 18–96 years), current users of e-cigarette and current or ex-smokers of tobacco.
France Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS associated with e-cigarette use only when not on a diet, p < 0.05. Lequy et al. [36]
Human Male participants (n = 7505, aged 19 years or older), users of e-cigarette or tobacco or dual users. Republic of Korea Urinary cotinine No differences, however in the adjusted model odds ratio for MetS was 2.79 (p < 0.001) compared with never smokers and 1.57 (p = 0.038) compared with cigarette-only smokers. Kim et al. [37]
Human Participants
(n = 17,656, aged 20–70 years), data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, tobacco or dual users.
Republic of Korea Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS among women and among men using packet of cigarettes for 20 years or more, OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.48–10.93. Oh et al. [38]
TOBACCO SMOKE
In vitro-cells Mouse embryo 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes (ATCC®CL-173™, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). United States Exposure to cigarette smoke, electronic cigarettes, and heated tobacco products. Increased metabolic activity after 24 h (p < 0.05) and 48 h (p < 0.01) of treatment of tobacco smoke. Zagoriti et al. [33]
Animal Male Wistar rats (young adults). Jordan Exposure to waterpipe tobacco smoke. Increased risk of MetS - abdominal circumference (p < 0.0001), body weight (p = 0.02), systolic blood pressure (p < 0.0001), fasting blood glucose (p < 0.0001). Al-Sawalha et al. [22]
Human Male participants
(n = 5697, aged 26–75 years).
Japan Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS p < 0.05 compared with nonsmokers. Matsushita et al. [20]
Human Participants
(n = 3051, aged 20–60 years).
United States Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS: each year increase in cigarette smoking, odds ratio (95% CI), 1.00 (0.99, 1.02), between current smoker or past, 1.51 (0.80, 2.87) vs. 1.64 (0.97, 2.79). Yankey et al. [23]
Human Participants
(n = 2212, aged 30–49 years).
Venezuela Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS p < 0.001 compared with nonsmokers, in the multivariate analysis: smokers: OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11–2.14, p = 0.010. Bermudez et al. [24]
Human Participants
(n = 694, aged 18–44 years).
Taiwan Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS males higher MetS prevalence than females p < 0.001. Lin et al. [26]
Human Participants
(n = 430, aged 22.52 ± 0.40 years).
Chile Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS, linear regression model: MetS score p < 0.02. Cheng et al. [27]
Human Participants
(n = 1637, aged 70.5–7.9 years).
Colombia Questionnaire Increased risk of MetS, OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.0–2.4, p = 0.034. Barranco-Ruiz et al. [28]