Table 3.

Differences in PCL-5 cluster scores and SF-36 health survey scores between groups with different perceptions of social support.

Scores		Low		Moderate		High
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	K–W H 1	p
PCL-5	B	2.6a	0.8	1.8b	0.7	1.4b	0.5	66.042	<0.001 *
	C	2.4a	1.1	2.0b	1.1	1.7b	0.9	17.547	<0.001 *
	D	2.2a	0.9	1.6b	0.8	1.2b	0.6	40.941	<0.001 *
	E	2.2a	0.8	2.0a	0.8	1.2b	0.5	38.331	<0.001 *
	TPCL-5	46.5a	15.3	36.0b	13.7	25.6c	10.6	51.441	<0.001 *
SF-36	VT	27.9b	15.2	32.8ab	18.8	40.5a	17.0	13.532	0.001 *
	SF	31.5c	17.4	40.2b	20.0	61.2a	13.5	51.998	<0.001 *
	RE	5.4b	17.1	26.7a	37.0	32.2a	40.3	39.278	<0.001 *
	MH	34.0b	13.6	40.2a	16.4	46.9a	11.5	22.779	<0.001 *
	MCS	24.7c	10.7	35.0b	17.3	45.2a	11.2	55.005	<0.001 *

B-Intrusion, C-Avoidance, D-Cognition and mood, E-Arousal and reactivity, TPCL-5-Total PCL-5 score, VT-Vitality, SF-Social functioning, RE-Emotional roles limitation, MH-Mental health, MCS Mental component score; K–W H-Kruskal–Wallis H value. The K–W H critical value was 5.992 for all variables. Groups sharing the same letter (a–c) are not significantly different according to Dunn test. * p < 0.05.