Table 6.

The classification efficiency with different weighting factors. The best performance indicators of all the taxonomies are marked as bold.

w	0.5	0.55	0.6	0.65	0.7	0.75	0.8	0.85	0.9	0.95	1.0
ori.	1.48	1.46	1.46	1.48	1.55	1.48	1.49	1.53	1.55	1.52	1.64
cri. 1	1.61	1.62	1.61	1.61	1.59	1.59	1.65	1.62	1.69	1.59	1.73
cri. 2	1.62	1.44	1.60	1.49	1.66	1.50	1.62	1.62	1.53	1.64	1.67
cri. 3	1.64	1.62	1.62	1.61	1.62	1.53	1.61	1.68	1.62	1.60	1.75
cri. 4	1.83	1.83	1.84	1.84	1.84	1.84	1.92	1.87	1.87	1.90	1.86
cri. 5	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.02	2.05
$\overline{\xi }$ ± s	1.70 ± 0.18	1.66 ± 0.20	1.69 ± 0.19	1.67 ± 0.19	1.71 ± 0.16	1.66 ± 0.20	1.72 ± 0.19	1.72 ± 0.17	1.71 ± 0.18	1.71 ± 0.18	1.78 ± 0.14