Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;22(11):1314. doi: 10.3390/e22111314

Table 8.

Comparison of different variants of our method on VOC2007. The best performance indicators of all the taxonomies are marked as bold.

ori. cri. 1 cri. 2 cri. 3 cri. 4 cri. 5 ξ¯ ± s
with all components 0.59 0.68 0.73 0.63 0.90 1.12 0.77 ± 0.19
No log-ratio loss 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.30 0.50 0.71 0.42 ± 0.14
No feature learning 0.27 0.30 0.33 0.28 0.40 0.54 0.35 ± 0.09
No active selection 0.58 0.66 0.69 0.62 0.85 1.01 0.73 ± 0.15
No verification 0.45 0.47 0.47 0.45 0.48 0.53 0.47 ± 0.03
No weighted blending 0.32 0.43 0.48 0.35 0.81 0.99 0.56 ± 0.25
No CRF 0.56 0.63 0.69 0.60 0.89 1.09 0.74 ± 0.19
No verification stopping 0.53 0.65 0.62 0.55 0.89 1.09 0.72 ± 0.20