Table 5.
Effect of IPTp on malaria incidence in infants that is mediated by preventing placental malaria
Infant category | Total effect | Direct effect | Mediated effect | % of mediated effecta | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRR (95% CI) | p-value | IRR (95% CI) | p-value | IRR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
All sexes | 0.89 (0.75–1.04) | 0.16 | 0.94 (0.73–1.17) | 0.58 | 0.95 (0.77–1.16) | 0.61 | 43.5% |
Male | 0.77 (0.61–0.99) | 0.05 | 0.97 (0.67–1.36) | 0.89 | 0.79 (0.56–1.09) | 0.17 | 89.7% |
Females | 1.01 (0.81–1.26) | 0.96 | 0.92 (0.71–1.22) | 0.56 | 1.09 (0.87–1.38) | 0.45 | – |
CI confidence intervals, IRR incidence rate ratio
IRRs represent the effect of IPTp DP versus SP on the incidence of malaria in infants. Confidence intervals reported here were obtained by bootstrapping and may differ from those reported in the primary analysis which used the delta method specifying robust standard errors
aProportion of mediated effect was calculated using [ln(IRRmediated effect)/ln(IRRtotal effect)]*100