Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;10:21060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78034-6

Table 3.

Influence of PGPB and their method of application on chlorophyll content 52, 72 and 88 DAS.

Treatments Chlorophyll content (SPAD values)
52 DAS 72 DAS 88 DAS
PGPB
A. chroococcum 49.86 ± 4.02 a 61.10 ± 3.23 ab 60.19 ± 2.13 a
B. subtilis 40.24 ± 4.56 c 55.74 ± 3.32 c 58.53 ± 1.74 b
B. megatherium 44.67 ± 3.73 b 58.76 ± 3.91 abc 58.56 ± 2.09 b
Mix A 37.50 ± 2.07 c 58.00 ± 3.04 bc 60.67 ± 2.34 a
Mix B 48.59 ± 4.64 a 61.15 ± 4.86 ab 57.02 ± 1.91 b
Control 47.18 ± 2.80 ab 62.22 ± 2.79 a 57.16 ± 0.75 b
Application
Foliar 42.37 ± 4.77 b 57.83 ± 3.91 b 57.42 ± 1.46 b
Soil 46.97 ± 5.75 a 61.16 ± 3.46 a 59.97 ± 2.18 a

DAS: Days After Sowing. Mix A: A. chroococcum + B. subtilis (1:1), Mix B: A. chroococcum + B. megatherium (1:1). Means followed by the same letter for treatments are not significantly different according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. Values presented are mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation.