Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;10:21060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78034-6

Table 5.

Influence of PGPB and their method of application on photosynthetic rate 52, 72 and 88 DAS.

Treatments Photosynthetic rate (μmol CO2m−2 s−1)
52 DAS 72 DAS 88 DAS
PGPB
A. chroococcum 25.75 ± 2.60 b 35.36 ± 2.59 c 32.97 ± 2.75 ab
B. subtilis 26.16 ± 2.68 b 37.10 ± 2.79 ab 32.42 ± 2.44 b
B. megatherium 25.51 ± 2.97 b 35.90 ± 2.65 bc 34.96 ± 2.60 a
Mix A 26.41 ± 2.87 b 35.92 ± 2.63 bc 31.46 ± 2.98 b
Mix B 28.56 ± 2.58 a 37.36 ± 2.68 a 30.68 ± 2.97 b
Control 21.74 ± 1.35 c 31.80 ± 1.30 d 30.65 ± 2.74 b
Application
Foliar 23.71 ± 1.85 b 33.61 ± 1.42 b 30.41 ± 2.14 b
Soil 27.67 ± 2.93 a 37.54 ± 2.79 a 33.97 ± 2.62 a

DAS: Days After Sowing. Mix A: A. chroococcum + B. subtilis (1:1), Mix B: A. chroococcum + B. megatherium (1:1). Means followed by the same letter for treatments are not significantly different according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. Values presented are mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation.