Table 3. Results of the 2x2x2x2 robust rank-aligned ANOVA for social judgments depending on the participants’ sex (sex), the sex of the presented face stimulus (sex-stim), the emotional expression (emotion) and the type of social judgment (task).
F(1,134) | p | pη2 | |
---|---|---|---|
sex | 0.13 | .717 | .001 |
42.81 | < .001 | .242 | |
6.59 | .014 | .047 | |
964.13 | < .001 | .878 | |
sex * emotion | 0.92 | .339 | .007 |
167.50 | < .001 | .556 | |
sex * task | 1.60 | .208 | .012 |
121.42 | < .001 | .475 | |
sex * sex-stim * emotion | 0.95 | .331 | .007 |
10.14 | .002 | .070 | |
7.95 | .006 | .056 | |
216.06 | < .001 | .617 | |
sex * emotion * task | 2.09 | .151 | .015 |
sex-stim * emotion * task | 0.96 | .330 | .007 |
sex * sex-stim * emotion * task | 0.37 | .544 | .003 |
Please note: Statistically significant effects are highlighted in red.