Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243230

Table 3. Results of the 2x2x2x2 robust rank-aligned ANOVA for social judgments depending on the participants’ sex (sex), the sex of the presented face stimulus (sex-stim), the emotional expression (emotion) and the type of social judgment (task).

F(1,134) p pη2
sex 0.13 .717 .001
sex-stim 42.81 < .001 .242
sex*sex-stim 6.59 .014 .047
emotion 964.13 < .001 .878
sex * emotion 0.92 .339 .007
task 167.50 < .001 .556
sex * task 1.60 .208 .012
sex-stim*emotion 121.42 < .001 .475
sex * sex-stim * emotion 0.95 .331 .007
sex-stim*task 10.14 .002 .070
sex*sex-stim*task 7.95 .006 .056
emotion*task 216.06 < .001 .617
sex * emotion * task 2.09 .151 .015
sex-stim * emotion * task 0.96 .330 .007
sex * sex-stim * emotion * task 0.37 .544 .003

Please note: Statistically significant effects are highlighted in red.