Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2020 Jun 24;41(9):1577–1587. doi: 10.1002/humu.24061

Table 2.

Prevalence of Rare VCL pLOF Variants (MAF in gnomAD <0.00002*) in Probands vs. gnomAD

Exomes Samples from the gnomAD Database (v2.1) Probands Referred for Cardiomyopathy Testing Probands with Clinical Diagnosis of DCM [LMM + ICL/RBH + OMGL]
Number of Individuals 125,297* 18,135 3,118
Number of VCL pLOF Alleles 39 23 11
Prevalence of VCL pLOF Variants 0.00031 0.0013 0.0035
Odds Ratio Compared to Prevalence in gnomAD (95% CI) N/A 4.07 (2.43–6.82) 11.33 (5.80–22.15)
p value N/A <0.0001 <0.0001

This analysis is identical to the one presented in Table 3 but excludes two variants that are more common in gnomAD (p.Pro943Argfs*9 and p.Ala573Hisfs*8), as well as the multi exon duplication variant (c.241_622+1dup). Variants predicted to escape nonsense mediated decay in gnomAD or the proband cohort and those flagged as dubious in gnomAD v2.1 exomes were excluded from the analysis. MAF: minor allele frequency; DCM: dilated cardiomyopathy; LMM: Laboratory of Molecular Medicine cohort; ICL/RBH: Imperial College London/Royal Brompton Hospital; pLOF; putative loss of function.

*

Average number of individuals across all pLOF VCL variants.