Table 1.
Method and area of focus | Outcome of interest | |
Step 1: interactive session | ||
|
Implementationa | Degree of execution of tasks and success or failure of execution of tasks |
Step 2: SUSb | ||
|
Acceptabilityc | Satisfaction with the app |
|
Demandd | Intention to use the app |
|
Implementation | Degree of execution of tasks |
Step 3: interview | ||
|
Acceptability | Satisfaction with the app, perceived appropriateness, and fit within the organizational culture |
|
Demand | Perceived demand and intention to use the app |
|
Implementation | Degree of execution of tasks, success or failure of execution of tasks, and factors affecting implementation ease or difficulty |
|
Practicalitye | Expected benefits and burden for end users and ability of HCPsf to carry out tasks in their routine daily practice |
|
Integrationg | Perceived fit with local care infrastructure at the patient and organizational level and perceived sustainability at the patient and organizational level |
Step 4: baseline questionnaire | Profession, age, work experience, size of organization, amount of patient consultations for COPDh in a week, average time available for patient consultations, disease severity of patients with COPD in daily care, current use of written action plan, current use of mobile health |
aImplementation: the extent, likelihood, and manner in which the Copilot app can be used by health care providers as planned and proposed.
bSUS: System Usability Scale.
cAcceptability: how the health care provider reacts to the Copilot app.
dDemand: To what extent is the Copilot app likely to be used by the health care provider.
ePracticality: To what extent the Copilot app can be used by health care providers in their routine daily practice considering the available resources.
fHCP: health care provider.
gIntegration: to what extent can the Copilot app be integrated in Dutch primary, secondary, and tertiary care settings.
hCOPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.