Table 2.

Mean (95% CI) proportion of “Old” responses and signal-detection indices as a function of item type/index and group/list type for test lists with strongly related lures (Experiment 1), weakly related lures (Experiment 2), and means pooled across experiments.

	Experiment 1: strongly related lure		Experiment 2: weakly related lure		Pooled experiments
Encoding group/item type/index	Read	Gen	Read	Gen	Read	Gen
N	32	32	34	34	66	66
List items	0.76 (0.05)	0.85 (0.05)	0.83 (0.03)	0.85 (0.03)	0.80 (0.03)	0.85 (0.03)
List item controls	0.15 (0.04)	0.10 (0.03)	0.10 (0.04)	0.07 (0.03)	0.12 (0.03)	0.08 (0.02)
List items dʹ	1.96 (0.19)	2.53 (0.22)	2.41 (0.20)	2.68 (0.19)	2.19 (0.15)	2.60 (0.15)
List items λ	1.17 (0.19)	1.36 (0.15)	1.39 (0.17)	1.57 (0.14)	1.28 (0.13)	1.47 (0.11)
Critical lures	0.58 (0.05)	0.46 (0.09)	0.66 (0.07)	0.51 (0.08)	0.62 (0.04)	0.48 (0.06)
Critical lure controls	0.18 (0.04)	0.13 (0.04)	0.18 (0.06)	0.13 (0.05)	0.18 (0.04)	0.13 (0.03)
Critical lures dʹ	1.20 (0.19)	1.00 (0.27)	1.45 (0.21)	1.19 (0.26)	1.33 (0.14)	1.10 (0.19)
Critical lures λ	0.97 (0.16)	1.15 (0.16)	0.99 (0.20)	1.17 (0.16)	0.98 (0.13)	1.17 (0.11)
Related lures	0.27 (0.05)	0.16 (0.05)	0.20 (0.05)	0.12 (0.04)	0.23 (0.04)	0.14 (0.03)
Related lure controls	0.13 (0.05)	0.11 (0.05)	0.06 (0.03)	0.02 (0.02)	0.09 (0.03)	0.06 (0.03)
Related lures dʹ	0.49 (0.17)	0.19 (0.23)	0.48 (0.19)	0.38 (0.14)	0.49 (0.13)	0.29 (0.13)
Related lures λ	1.17 (0.18)	1.25 (0.17)	1.42 (0.13)	1.57 (0.06)	1.30 (0.11)	1.41 (0.10)