Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 21;37(12):2913–2928. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01966-5

Table 3.

Assessment of risk of bias of each study

graphic file with name 10815_2020_1966_Tab3_HTML.jpg

aMore than 10% of missing data

bCOH protocol is different in both groups. And frozen-thawed embryo transfers were done in LPS group while fresh embryo transfer were done in eFPS group

cMost known important variables are balanced

dIt is unclear if some known important variables are balanced or not

eBoth intervention and comparator were performed on the same group of women within a 12-month period. Therefore, variables are balanced

fCOH protocol is different in both groups

gWomen’s age was different in both groups. Only unsuccessful cycles in the eFPS cycles were included

hIt is unclear if some known important variables are balanced or not

iCOH protocol is different in both groups. Besides, denominator are cycles and not women

jCOH protocol is different in both groups and participants in eFPS group are younger