Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;10:577530. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.577530

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for 5-year survival in LUAD and LUSC.

LUAD LUSC
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis (adjusted for age) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR P >|z| 95% CI HR P >|z| 95% CI HR P >|z| 95% CI HR P >|z| 95% CI
GPR115
 High vs. Low
2.192 0.001* 1.401–3.428 1.706 0.039* 0.940–3.097 1.735 0.193 0.833–2.442
Age (years)
 ≤60 vs. >60
1.223 0.364 0.792–1.887 0.818 0.477 0.471–1.422
Gender
 1 vs. 2
0.516 0.003* 0.333–0.798 0.485 0.028* 0.254–0.926 0.902 0.842 0.327–2.489
Smoking
 No vs. Yes
2.517 0.003* 1.378–4.595 1.615 0.201 0.755–3.367 0.804 0.531 0.407–1.589
Differentiation
 1 vs. 2 vs. 3
2.410 <0.001* 1.578–3.681 1.914 0.026* 1.081–3.391 0.850 0.482 0.540–1.337
TNM stage
 1 vs. 2 vs. 3
1.814 <0.001* 1.374–2.395 1.018 0.967 0.439–2.357 1.823 <0.001* 1.312–2.531 1.481 0.167 0.848–2.585
T
 1 vs. 2 vs. 3
1.910 <0.001* 1.340–2.722 1.212 0.542 0.653–2.247 0.964 0.871 0.621–1.497
N
 0 vs. 1 vs. 2
1.709 <0.001* 1.331–2.195 1.715 0.107 0.889–3.309 1.744 <0.001* 1.287–2.363 1.278 0.354 0.761–2.144
M
 M0 vs. M1
1.137 0.857 0.028–4.626 4.229 0.159 0.567–31.521

*P < 0.05.

Gender 1, Male, Gender 2, Female.

Differentiation 1, well; Differentiation 2, Middle; Differentiation 3, Poor.

TNM 1, IA and IB; TNM 2, IIA and IIB; TNM 3, IIIA, IIIB, and IV.