Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;93(1116):20200247. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200247

Table 2.

Different options for a UK heavy ion facility, considering capabilities, flexibility and cost, in descending order

Option Characteristics Ions Estimated cost Timeline
1. Clinical and research facility incorporating new accelerator and gantry design. Beams capable of penetrating 30 cm in water, so up to 425 MeV/u for Carbon ions. Two or more clinical treatment rooms and one research room containing both pre-clinical and in vitro beam lines where clinical beam delivery can be emulated. H, He, Li, B, C, O £400M 10 years
2. Clinical and research facility using existing accelerator technology. Beams capable of penetrating 30 cm in water. One or more clinical treatment rooms with one or more gantries to deliver C ions. Capability to test alternative technologies for patient treatment (e.g. chairs) Possible smaller gantry for H or He treatment. Research room containing both pre-clinical and in vitro beam lines where clinical beam delivery can be emulated (as one above). H, He, C £200M 5 years
3. Clinical and research facility similar to two above, using existing technology, but only delivers H and He ions; with gantry for both H and He ions. Beams capable of penetrating 30 cm in water. Capability to test alternative technologies for patient treatment (e.g. chairs) Research room containing both pre-clinical and in vitro beam lines where clinical beam delivery can be emulated (as 1 and 2 above). H, He £150M 5 years
4. Pre-clinical research facility (50–60 MeV/u), new accelerator and gantry design (or alternatives). Capability for in vitro research. Not suitable for clinical treatment. H, He, Li, B, C, O £100M 5 years
5. Preclinical research facility, lower energy (20 MeV/u), existing technology (similar to Option 4). Heavy ions, such as C, only preclinical for superficial tumours. Not for clinical treatment. H, He, Li, B, C, O £50M 2–3 years

SFRT, spatially fractionated radiotherapy.

Timeline does not include time to identify asuitable site and obtain planning permission.

Although the consensus focussed on protons and 12C ions, B and Li ions (intermediate in mass) and heavier O ions, were also discussed. A facility should also have capability for FLASH and SFRTdelivery.