Table 4.
Ref.
|
Kappa value (95%CI)
|
I
2
(95%CI), %
|
P
value
|
Chen et al[25] | 0.75 (0.62; 0.84) | 92.42 (87.07; 95.57) | < 0.01 |
Schellhaas et al[20] | 0.79 (0.71; 0.85) | 89.44 (80.83; 94.22) | < 0.01 |
Ling et al[28] | 0.77 (0.67; 0.84) | 92.30 (86.72; 95.58) | < 0.01 |
Liu et al[26] | 0.78 (0.69; 0.85) | 91.44 (84.80; 95.13) | < 0.01 |
Zhou et al[27] | 0.74 (0.63; 0.82) | 89.78 (81.61; 94.36) | < 0.01 |
Tan et al[21] | 0.73 (0.62; 0.80) | 90.21 (82.51; 94.60) | < 0.01 |
Wang et al[6] | 0.76 (0.64; 0.85) | 92.41 (86.90; 95.59] | < 0.01 |
Cui et al1 | 0.77 (0.67; 0.85) | 92.04 (86.02; 95.43) | < 0.01 |
This is our study. CI: Confidence interval.